Skip to main content

Mid-Term Paper: The Original vs. The Myth (due March 9)

English 2653

Mid-Term Paper: The Original vs. the Myth

INTRO: One of the most common statements a reader can make upon encountering Frankenstein, Sherlock Holmes¸ or Alice in Wonderland in the original is, “I didn’t know it was like this!” Even though both are iconic works of literature that have spawned dozens of ‘sequels’ in books, films, comics, and elsewhere, relatively few people experience the original—or know how it differs from its modern-day mythology. And yet, the book is what remains, and what we ultimately have to return to so we can understand who these characters are and why their stories so captivated their audiences’ imaginations.

PROMPT: For this paper, I want you to explore the difference between the original and the myth with at least ONE of these works. To do this, consider what you knew, or thought you knew, about the work before you read it, and what surprised you, excited you, or confused (even annoyed) you about the real thing. Compare this to at least ONE of the modern-day adaptations so we can understand how they willfully (or ignorantly?) interpret the characters and give people a different twist on the iconic stories. You might consider films, shows, fan fiction, and other popular culture depictions that are today more visible than the books themselves.

ALSO: Also, find at least 2 articles that discuss some aspect of your novel: these could be critical articles about some aspect of the novel itself, or one of the characters, or the modern-day adaptations, or anything related to our understanding of the book. Bring this into your conversation, so we can understand some of the issues surrounding the original vs. the myth of your work.

AND: Be sure to CLOSE READ specific passages of the novel to show us important themes and ideas that might not make it into the myth, or that you feel are essential for understanding its importance. Quote too from your articles and from your other primary source, the film/show/comic, etc. The idea is to have a CONVERSATION about the myth vs. the work with several different ‘people,’ these being your primary and secondary sources.

 REQUIREMENTS

  • Page limit up to you, but no one-pagers, please! Double space, too!
  • At least 1 other primary source, and at least 2 secondary sources
  • Close reading from the novel (enough to establish some important ideas/passages)
  • In-text citations should loosely follow MLA format and include a Works Cited page
  • You must have fun with this! This is exciting—you’re educating people on how popular culture changes literature, and whether or not this is for the greater good. Be a teacher…some of you might use these ideas in a future classroom.
  • DUE THURSDAY, MARCH 9th by 5pm [no class that day]

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For Monday: Short Lecture on Colonialism and Mansfield

As a way to introduce you to some of the themes we'll be exploring with our last two books, I've recorded a short lecture (about 18 min.) that I would have discussed with you in class if we were still meeting. I know 18 minutes is a lot to watch in a single stretch, so feel free to start and stop, or simply leave it playing in the background. However, I think it will help you see and understand some of the larger ideas going on behind the scenes in Mansfield's stories.  AFTER you watch the video, answer the following question as a COMMENT below: "Since many women in the early 19th century tried to hide their identity as a woman by adopting a male name, or writing more 'male' stories, how do you think colonial writers did the same? That is, how did they hide their colonial identity in writing to sound more 'English'? What might they have had to hide, or ignore, or not reveal as a writer? (This will count toward your participation grade, since I can...

Short Lecture on Being "Weak" in Mansfield's Stories

Before we race to the end of Mansfield's stories, I wanted to discuss some of the major themes we've encountered in several of them, particularly "Daughters of the Late Colonel," "The Life of Ma Parker," "Mr. and Mrs. Dove," and "Marriage a la Mode." Watch the video to hear some of my thoughts on these stories, most of which are drawn from your responses to the reading questions. It's a little longer than the last one, but still only about 25 minutes (sorry)!  After you finish, answer the following question as a COMMENT on the blog.  Q: Talking about emotions, love, death, or otherwise being "weak" was very taboo in British society at this time. What subjects or relationships do you feel are taboo in our own society? And I don't just mean awkward subjects (abortion, politics, etc.), but what emotions or experiences would you have trouble discussing with your parents, your siblings, your friends, and even your sig...

For Friday: Wordsworth, "Ode: Intimations of Immortality"

“Ode: Intimations of Immortality from Recollections in Early Childhood” (pp.51-57): read the entire poem, but the questions will only focus on Stanzas 1-7 NOTE: This is a longer poem, though it’s broken up into short stanza chapters.  Read it slowly, and focus on each stanza as an individual poem.  Then consider how each one develops a general ‘story’ or narrative about Wordsworth’s life.  Consider this, too, as a kind of mid-life crisis poem: Wordsworth feels himself pulling away from the innocent joys he used to experience in life, and the poem is an attempt to find himself—and to convince other readers to find themselves in the thickets of adulthood.  Answer TWO of the following... Q1: According to Stanzas 1-4, what causes the poet to feel distanced from the natural world?   What has come between him and his imagination/emotions?   In Stanza 2 he writes that “But yet I know, where’er I go,/That there hath past away a glory from the earth...