Answer TWO of the
following...
Q1: What arguments does
Victor give Walton for destroying the Creature’s incomplete mate? He was
earlier moved by the Creature’s loneliness, and also agreed that the Creature’s
arguments were sound. Why, at the very end, does he decide not to go through
with his “engagement”? Are his reasons equally sound?
Q2: Earlier in class, we
discussed the possibility that the Creature is Victor’s doppleganger,
his other half which he has psychically divorced from himself. Whether or not
this works, are there passages in the last few chapters that seem to support
this? Or, are their passages that would change significantly if we read the
Creature this way?
Q3: Is Victor a reliable
narrator? Do we trust his version of events (in greater or lesser ways)?
Consider passages such as, “He is eloquent and persuasive...but trust him not.
His soul is as hellish as his form, full of treachery and fiendlike malice.”
Related to this, is Walton’s narrative meant the story—or is he equally
suspect?
Q4: In The Rime of the
Ancient Mariner, the Wedding Guest is changed, becoming a “sadder and a
wiser man.” What effect does Victor have on Walton? Is he changed? Redeemed? Or
doomed? How closely does Shelley follow Coleridge’s example in her own work?