NOTE: For those interested, here is a link to the entire film of the 1993 Wide Sargasso Sea , the only feature film version of the novel. It's not bad, but it's not great...good actors, but it doesn't quite capture the magic and cruelty of the book. Still, if you dig the book, it's definitely worth a watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vQuSVJPDWk After you've read the very brief Part Three of Wide Sargasso Sea , answer the following as a Comment below (or e-mail it to me): Part Three is the only part where Rhys explicitly ties her novel into Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre . Why do you think she does this? Earlier, she makes the connections tempting and likely, but never exact. Here she makes it clear that Antoinette is the "madwoman in the attic" from Bronte's novel. Do you think this part of the novel is even necessary? What does it add--or take away--from the other two parts? Does it seem like an afterthought? Or does it form a sharper ...